The New York Times story on the John Kerry flub is a cartful of BS, according to this. First off, they take Kerry at his word that it was a joke that went badly. Fine, I can handle that. But then they misquote what he actually did say, to make it seem like you'd have to be an idiot not to realize it was supposed to be a joke. The problem the New York Times has is that anyone can look it up on YouTube, see Kerry speaking, hear the actual words come out of his mouth, and know that the New York Times is either flat out lying to save democrat votes, or made a severe mistake that any respectable news outlet ought to have caught. The New York Times is looking like a bunch of amateurs sitting around in their pajamas trying to find ways to save their outmoded business model and liberal affectations.

YouTube, people.... You can't make stuff up anymore, because we will see it and know the truth, and know you are a liar! Makes me wonder how much of recent, pre-internet explosion, history that we take for fact is actually lies spun in favor of whoever got to write the story.