I've always advocated finding cleaner sources of energy, but I've never supported extreme measure like Kyoto to fix global warming simply because the science isn't very exact at this point. It's sort of like human health, and how doctors change their views on what is good and what is bad every 10 years. The latest with global warming is that
planting trees might exacerbate global warming. I also found some articles quoting scientists who say that aerosol particles help block the sun's rays, and that if we eliminate aerosol waste, we will also exacerbate global warming.

Because of the proclivity for pro-Kyoto adherents to jump at any science that might help their cause, the world is stuck in a position where whatever we try to do will be really bad depending on who you talk to. There is no right answer yet, so for now I applaud Bush for inaction. Why make a move when the scientific opinions are so diverse and opposing that any sort of move could cause major problems. Smarter to sit still and wait until people come up with actual solutions instead of hearsay and rumor and what activists wish was true.