The US military is getting Iraqi presses to print waht is basically propaganda. Sounds like a smart move, and something every army in history has done a bit of. But here comes the LA Times, blasting Bush for only providing half the story and omitting anything that might make the US look bad. Umm.... Isn't that the point of propaganda, similar to how the LA Times will only print stuff that makes Bush look bad? The difference is that the LA Times is supposed to be objective and unbiased, whereas a propaganda campaign sort of misses the point if it's not biased.