I often get accused of never criticizing Bush or the GOP, which is ridiculous. I criticize them every time I think they've done wrong, and if you search through my archives (which might not be working right now), you'll find plenty of instances. Just recently I criticized Bush for his nomination of Miers to the Supreme Court. He followed up a sublime choice in John Roberts with his female lawyer buddy. Smacks of cronyism just a tad. Now I want to criticize the GOP people who are whining about Miers for a different reason. They won't get upset about cronyism because htey (and all politicians) do it themselves. I don't remember Democrats getting up in arms about Clinton having his wife try to reform national health care, despite that being full of nepotism. Hillary's only qualification for that one was that she's his wife. Anyway, the GOP people who are all about "We don't know enough about Miers, We need to find out her stance on various issues," etc. Somehow that argument sounds strange coming from them after they bashed the lefties for making the same arguments regarding Roberts. I guess all politicians are hypocrites, left and right.
A Daily Dose of Ben
Sometimes not quite daily!

2 Comments:
I think you're wrong about the Clintons. It's not cronyism if you wife (an attorney, well versed in law) who also plays a role as a politician by being married to the president, wants to influence or construct legislation. I like the Miers "woman" anyway. Bush has a habit of picking buddies to do this crap, so I don't really care either way.
You do point out flaws of the GOP, but sometimes you tend to twist things the left does. Like it matters though, they're all a bunch of liars, like you said.
As far as twisting, what do you think of the Plame thing now? The latest is that Novak's original source was not in the White House, Miller doesn't remember for sure, but does not think that Libby told her Plame's name or identity, and Rove may be indictment for perjury, but not for leaking. However, Bush had technically said anyone "involved." The left would like to force him to be fired even if his involvement consisted of giving Novak a piece of gum on the day he wrote the story.
Post a Comment
<< Home