Just to beat a dying horse, anyone see some of the "journalists" talking about Bush's secret trip to Iraq? You have one editor of a presitgious, and widely regarded as a liberally-biased, newspaper saying that the rest of the press should have been let on to the trip by the White House because of course the press can keep a secret when it has legitimate security reasons. Then you have an editor of another presitigous and widely considered to be a liberally biased journal saying that he's upset that the press that was in on the deal didn't somehow leak word to the rest of the press. So one guy is saying they can keep a secret, the other guy is saying that he would not have kept the secret. And these people wonder why there is so much distrust of the mainstream media.